Fairly Rating Tracks

Me and @NitroraptorXTS have done this, but I want to bring more attention to it. Here are the things you should use to rate tracks:

track layout
image looks (pretty, fits title well)
collision
checkpoints that work
respawn points that don't suck

Count how many out of 5 the track fulfills, and that's a good rating to give the track!

Indeed, that's a good way to rate tracks and you could also add off road, the theme of the track and if the drawing of the track itself is good unless if you use an image from Google but if it's a hand drawn track then you should use that as part of the rating and the same for all the others I listed.

I will start rating and giving feedbacks to tracks soon but not right now since I don't feel like giving ratings now.

Off road falls under collision, the drawing falls under looksies, and the theme falls under looksies too. If you pick from the internet, it just means if the image you chose looks good.

Complete Mode: My original message

Quick Mode:

Track Layout
Originality (not a freaking square)
Item Boxes
Reasonable Lap Count (No unneccessary 9 laps lol)
No Jump/Boost spam

Edit: Screw it if it's a square just rate 1/5

BTW, if you want higher rates, you can also use this as a guide to the things you should look for in YOUR OWN track! That will give you a better rate from me :​)

Squares suck. Sad to think there are so many out there.