I will answer any questions you ask
This topic has been locked
3650 - 
13652 pts ★ Champion
5368 pts ★ NoviceOn 2024-04-06 at 13:44:21
A person's partner is starving. They see food in the corner of a shop window but they're broke. They know that their parents are wealthy but they also know they will not lend them money as they hate their partner. Eventually the person decides to steal money from their parents to feed their partner. Is the person wrong or justified?
Wrostified
On 2024-04-06 at 15:04:32
A person's partner is starving. They see food in the corner of a shop window but they're broke. They know that their parents are wealthy but they also know they will not lend them money as they hate their partner. Eventually the person decides to steal money from their parents to feed their partner. Is the person wrong or justified?
I mean karma's a bitch but the parents are being bitchier so I'd say it's justified.
On 2024-04-06 at 15:14:43
A person's partner is starving. They see food in the corner of a shop window but they're broke. They know that their parents are wealthy but they also know they will not lend them money as they hate their partner. Eventually the person decides to steal money from their parents to feed their partner. Is the person wrong or justified?
I mean karma's a bitch but the parents are being bitchier so I'd say it's justified.
3On 2024-04-06 at 20:33:49
In court, you see conjoined twins (that cannot be separated from eachother) being accused of assault. The judge finds that only one of the twins is guilty, but the other is innocent. How do you punish the guilty twin without punishing the other?
Put one in a minature, hovering jail cell that can easily be moved around by the other twin
On 2024-04-07 at 00:44:29
A person's partner is starving. They see food in the corner of a shop window but they're broke. They know that their parents are wealthy but they also know they will not lend them money as they hate their partner. Eventually the person decides to steal money from their parents to feed their partner. Is the person wrong or justified?
I mean karma's a bitch but the parents are being bitchier so I'd say it's justified.
Simple, kill everyone involved. Genocide is ALWAYS the answer!
I really don't think this is the best thing to say with all that is happening right now...
3
1On 2024-04-07 at 01:18:35
A person's partner is starving. They see food in the corner of a shop window but they're broke. They know that their parents are wealthy but they also know they will not lend them money as they hate their partner. Eventually the person decides to steal money from their parents to feed their partner. Is the person wrong or justified?
I mean karma's a bitch but the parents are being bitchier so I'd say it's justified.
Simple, kill everyone involved. Genocide is ALWAYS the answer!
I really don't think this is the best thing to say with all that is happening right now...
Understood, message removed (IK it's actually pointless, but at least I learned)
3
3On 2024-04-07 at 03:53:24
Ok very dark question coming right up
Your best friend is tied to a railroad, and a train is racing toward him/her. You can throw a switch, redirect the train, and save your friend, but if you do the five people tied to the other railroad will be, uh, ended. Will you save your friend or the five strangers?
One of my atheist friends asked me this once I wanna see what you say
Your best friend is tied to a railroad, and a train is racing toward him/her. You can throw a switch, redirect the train, and save your friend, but if you do the five people tied to the other railroad will be, uh, ended. Will you save your friend or the five strangers?
One of my atheist friends asked me this once I wanna see what you say
1On 2024-04-07 at 09:26:51
Ok very dark question coming right up
Your best friend is tied to a railroad, and a train is racing toward him/her. You can throw a switch, redirect the train, and save your friend, but if you do the five people tied to the other railroad will be, uh, ended. Will you save your friend or the five strangers?
One of my atheist friends asked me this once I wanna see what you say
Your best friend is tied to a railroad, and a train is racing toward him/her. You can throw a switch, redirect the train, and save your friend, but if you do the five people tied to the other railroad will be, uh, ended. Will you save your friend or the five strangers?
One of my atheist friends asked me this once I wanna see what you say
So basically it’s the Trolley Problem reworded
1On 2024-04-07 at 10:34:54
Ok very dark question coming right up
Your best friend is tied to a railroad, and a train is racing toward him/her. You can throw a switch, redirect the train, and save your friend, but if you do the five people tied to the other railroad will be, uh, ended. Will you save your friend or the five strangers?
One of my atheist friends asked me this once I wanna see what you say
Your best friend is tied to a railroad, and a train is racing toward him/her. You can throw a switch, redirect the train, and save your friend, but if you do the five people tied to the other railroad will be, uh, ended. Will you save your friend or the five strangers?
One of my atheist friends asked me this once I wanna see what you say
My best friend in any scenario would lead to one of my poly lovers (Pixel or my irl crush) so I'd have to pick them to save rather than the 5, problem with this trolley problem is it's entirely individualistic and not generalizable in any way
On 2024-04-07 at 11:40:46
Ok very dark question coming right up
Your best friend is tied to a railroad, and a train is racing toward him/her. You can throw a switch, redirect the train, and save your friend, but if you do the five people tied to the other railroad will be, uh, ended. Will you save your friend or the five strangers?
One of my atheist friends asked me this once I wanna see what you say
Your best friend is tied to a railroad, and a train is racing toward him/her. You can throw a switch, redirect the train, and save your friend, but if you do the five people tied to the other railroad will be, uh, ended. Will you save your friend or the five strangers?
One of my atheist friends asked me this once I wanna see what you say
It would be very easy for me to decide to save my best friend in a simulation like this, however, in real life I believe most won't end up pulling the switch as they would be under shock by the scenario and begin to question themselves whether the train has sensors to make it stop, if they will go to prison for pulling the switch etc.
3On 2024-04-07 at 11:55:16
lightyear is much better than metal gear
Guilty Gear is obviously better (I'm joking the only thing I even know about it is the existence of bridget)
22On 2024-04-07 at 21:44:15
lightyear is much better than metal gear
Guilty Gear is obviously better (I'm joking the only thing I even know about it is the existence of bridget)
I made this post like 10 hours ago and now I have a playstation emulator set up with guilty gear 1 wtf was that 💀
2
On 2024-04-08 at 01:06:20
I must know, how the heck is a human being supposed to consume the snack collectively known as a candy cane? Keep in mind not only the Candy Cane's shape, but the fact it melts easily.
2On 2024-04-08 at 01:07:15
I must know, how the heck is a human being supposed to consume the snack collectively known as a candy cane? Keep in mind not only the Candy Cane's shape, but the fact it melts easily.
By eating it
On 2024-04-08 at 01:11:02
Can a tin can?
211On 2024-04-08 at 08:53:08
Can a tin can?
Yes, but a match can't box
On 2024-04-08 at 08:54:24
I must know, how the heck is a human being supposed to consume the snack collectively known as a candy cane? Keep in mind not only the Candy Cane's shape, but the fact it melts easily.
Suck on the candy cane
On 2024-04-08 at 10:10:54
Can a tin can?
Is this from The Impossible Quiz
1On 2024-04-08 at 11:38:22
Can a tin can?
Is this from The Impossible Quiz
Yes No
Maybe Mustache
4