Mario Kart PC Forum - Advanced search

100-200 players? Keineo's tournament with 48 players is already way more than people who actually play this game, idk why people think this site is super popular. x-x

People also aren't gonna dedicate themselves to a forum post for a year, not to mention someone with 0 lounges creating a competitive tournament.

The way you rank "skill" doesn't make much sense either (especially if it includes battle mode), as it requires to grind in which case, just use the VR system the website already has.

I'm all for people playing the game, but I reccomend people should make smaller tournaments. I get that some kind of 'grand challenge' sounds very exciting but it requires a lot of work which simply isn't feasible on the forums.

Cup limit is 40* (160 tracks)

The Top Rated Creations page is very broken (Wargor logic moment)
For example your multicup is followed by Bowsers Maze with 4.89★ and 9 reviews which is simply not accurate for the top 54th creation at all LOL
Not meaning to diss you or anything, 22 reviews is nothing to scoff at but I just want to make things clear.

You definitely should. There aren't really that many tutorials for people to get into it in the first place.

Let me start off by saying at the time of writing this, there are 65K Complete Mode circuits. It is very unrealistic to expect all of them to get a lot of ratings. This has the issue of Mario Maker where there's a lot of people making levels, but nobody that's really playing them. People on this website only tend to talk about themselves/their own creations, which is fine but you can't really expect people to care if you don't care either.

I do agree though that the website should put a larger emphasis on playing custom tracks (custom tracks in general tbh) since gathering online rooms can be quite challenging and GP/VS mode gets kind of boring.


I'm guessing by "non professional" you mean they're made on websites like pixilart which generally speaking are often not very good tracks no. However keep in mind that using websites or software like pixilart or MS Paint is an active choice people make. The "professional" stuff better track creators use is free software. Anyone can download it.


Again, I do somewhat actually agree. Not to brag but since people like me and TheNudgyHampter are at the "top" we do develop somewhat of an elitist attitude so we do tend to make fun of some things. However don't think this applies to just bad tracks since we often make fun of good tracks too even if there's just one thing slightly wrong with it.


I'm going to have to cut you off here, the majority of Retro Rewind's tracks are not good. I don't think it is necessarily a bad project, since it gets less skilled track creators together. Though you can't really expect people to prefer this over MKPC Generations. You guys should strive to improve rather then hate on people who rightfully criticize it.


Honestly I don't really like numbered reviews because anything that doesn't get a near perfect rating immediately becomes 'bad'. 3/5 is not bad, it is literally over 50%. Also, listening to people that make high quality tracks would be wise since they actually know what makes a track good. Ignoring good track creators and calling them 'haters' is like trusting ChatGPT over your doctor. I can understand it being demotivating but you can just take a break. Reflect on what you could've done better and actually listen to criticism. I still do it, even when 20 5★ reviews are not uncommon for me anymore, I still see flaws with my tracks and where to improve.


You shouldn't be concerned about other people. You should make custom tracks for yourself. Most good track creators just make tracks for themselves and if other people like it then it's a bonus. At the end of the day it is your hobby, if you don't get any enjoyment there is no point in doing it.


What you're doing is hide criticism by saying "It's just my artstyle" which is a bad habit many artists have. No, tracks don't have to be ultra realistic or whatever. Puff_with_a_gun's tracks are a great example of having a unique art style that doesn't look bad.


I can understand you're upset but this is just highly immature. If you're hating on stuff for being good then I'm sorry but I don't know how you can't see you're in the wrong here. Review bombing is also against the rules so I highly advice not to.


I don't think many people outside of the Retro Rewind circlejerk will. What I'm currently seeing is you being mad that you're not making top tier tracks and complaining about it instead of trying to improve. Everything I have said in this reply applies to more Retro Rewind creators, so if you are one I reccommend reading this response in full.

If you do want to improve, there are plenty of people you can reach out to for help.


Well said. I see multiple people think that just because they get the right software they'll suddenly magically be able to make good tracks which is simply not the case. Good programs definitely help but it ultimately comes down to the drive of the creator to make something good, which is just completely ignoring the gameplay aspect of custom tracks. RHcks and Nexus' may look really good but they definitely suffer from bad colissions. (no hate to them btw)

Meanwhile, Wii Luigi Circuit and NS2 Great ? Block Ruins look great despite being made in pixilart which is the stereotypical 'bad track site'.

I'm noticing you make a lot of topics without actually partaking in them.

What are you grinding for?

pp slide

I'd say 👻 Ghost Valley 3 is my favourite from the base tracks. I think it plays the best with this game's physics.

No offense but this is not going to take off. This exact multicup already exists. Twice.

The projects you're looking for are:

    • MKPC Generations (high quality tracks)
    •  Retro Rewind (lower quality tracks, reccomended if you're a beginner)

I like most of these except Toad and Toadette. I like their pogging faces, I'm kinda mixed on Koopa too.

Hammer Bro is definitely the character who needed an updated sprite the most cus my god, the current one is terrible.

Look at the second message of this topic. The message gets updated whenever a track gets accepted. (I double checked, all the information is still accurate.)
Though I feel like all the 'Work in Progress' statusses should be removed as alot of track creators (including myself) either took a break or haven't progressed in said track for a very VERY long time.

But yeah there hasn't been much progress lately besides Bowser's Castle

Visuals lack alot of detail
Colissions are terrible

Please compare your tracks to other accepted tracks before submitting

For anyone asking "Can I make ___?", you don't need permission to make a track. Just make the tracks you want to make and if they're good enough submit them here.

Saying topics are useless is equally useless, just report and shut up

Track art needs to be original, so no

I like 'But Good' more than CTGP PC which is the official name, not only does it sound funny but also describes the project pretty well imo.

Edit: Name has officially been changed to CTGP PC BG because it's a better name as well as avoid confusion with CTGP PC Deluxe

Correct, there just have been alot less submissions since the initial hype has died down + judges have gotten more strict. Currently replacing some bad tracks so no new cups for a while lol. In other words this project is a very slow burn. Also most of the good track creators on this site are kinda dead atm, assuming they even would have interest in the first place.

Hi I'm a judge on this project so I can accept or deny tracks as well



Your Mario Kart Stadium remake has been accepted with a score of 16/20 yippee


As there's a limit of one person per cup I won't be reviewing the other 2 tracks yet though I can safely say that the city is gonna be a huge X